↓ Skip to main content

Large-Scale Plans in the Field of Clinical Medicine: Research Center for Personal Genome-based Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-Scale Plans in the Field of Clinical Medicine: Research Center for Personal Genome-based Medicine
Published in
TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2014
DOI 10.5363/tits.19.6_34
Authors

Shoji TSUJI, Teruhiko HIGUCHI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,721,259
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#73
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,224
of 321,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.