You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
糖尿病の分類と診断基準に関する委員会報告
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.11213/tonyobyo.53.450 |
| Authors |
糖尿病診断基準に関する調査検討委員会, 清野 裕, 南條 輝志男, 田嶼 尚子, 門脇 孝, 柏木 厚典, 荒木 栄一, 伊藤 千賀子, 稲垣 暢也, 岩本 安彦, 春日 雅人, 花房 俊昭, 羽田 勝計, 植木 浩二郎 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
| Engineering | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#16
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,151
of 106,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them