↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Reverse Vessel Remodeling on Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Treated With Aggressive Lipid- and Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy ― Insight From MILLION Study ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Reverse Vessel Remodeling on Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Treated With Aggressive Lipid- and Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy ― Insight From MILLION Study ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, May 2017
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-16-1253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tadatsugu Gamou, Kenji Sakata, Hayato Tada, Tetsuo Konno, Kenshi Hayashi, Hidekazu Ino, Masakazu Yamagishi, Masa-aki Kawashiri, on behalf of the MILLION Study Group

Abstract

The MILLION study, a prospective randomized multicenter study, revealed that lipid and blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy resulted in regression of coronary plaque as determined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In the present study we performed additional analysis to investigate the associated factors with regression of coronary plaque.Methods and Results:We investigated serial 3D IVUS images from 68 patients in the MILLION study. Standard IVUS parameters were assessed at both baseline and follow-up (18-24 months). Volumetric data were standardized by length as normalized volume. In patients with plaque regression (n=52), plaque volumenormalizedsignificantly decreased from 64.8 to 55.8 mm(3)(P<0.0001) and vessel volumenormalizedsignificantly decreased from 135.0 to 127.5 mm(3)(P=0.0008). There was no difference in lumen volumenormalizedfrom 70.1 to 71.8 mm(3)(P=0.27). There were no correlations between % changes in vessel volume and cholesterol or BP. On the other hand, negative correlations between % change in vessel volume and vessel volumenormalizedat baseline (r=-0.352, P=0.009) or plaque volumenormalizedat baseline (r=-0.336, P=0.01) were observed. The current data demonstrated that in patients with plaque regression treated by aggressive lipid and BP-lowering therapy, the plaque regression was derived from reverse vessel remodeling determined by vessel volume and plaque burden at baseline irrespective of decreases in lipids and BP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,740
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,772
of 327,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#30
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.