↓ Skip to main content

Assembly of complex plant–fungus networks

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assembly of complex plant–fungus networks
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirokazu Toju, Paulo R. Guimarães, Jens M. Olesen, John N. Thompson

Abstract

Species in ecological communities build complex webs of interaction. Although revealing the architecture of these networks is fundamental to understanding ecological and evolutionary dynamics in nature, it has been difficult to characterize the structure of most species-rich ecological systems. By overcoming this limitation through next-generation sequencing technology, we herein uncover the network architecture of below-ground plant-fungus symbioses, which are ubiquitous to terrestrial ecosystems. The examined symbiotic network of a temperate forest in Japan includes 33 plant species and 387 functionally and phylogenetically diverse fungal taxa, and the overall network architecture differs fundamentally from that of other ecological networks. In contrast to results for other ecological networks and theoretical predictions for symbiotic networks, the plant-fungus network shows moderate or relatively low levels of interaction specialization and modularity and an unusual pattern of 'nested' network architecture. These results suggest that species-rich ecological networks are more architecturally diverse than previously recognized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 1%
France 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 403 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 20%
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 63 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 215 51%
Environmental Science 63 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Computer Science 7 2%
Physics and Astronomy 6 1%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 78 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,293,362
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,862
of 59,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,111
of 273,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#222
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.