The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conflicts Hypothesized in the Seventeen Article Constitution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.41.133 |
| Authors |
Kosei ISHII |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,406,147
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#7
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,207
of 62,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them