↓ Skip to main content

Description of an Estuarine Methylotrophic Methanogen Which Grows on Dimethyl Sulfide

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Description of an Estuarine Methylotrophic Methanogen Which Grows on Dimethyl Sulfide
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 1989
DOI 10.1128/aem.55.4.994-1002.1989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald S. Oremland, Ronald P. Kiene, Indra Mathrani, Michael J. Whiticar, David R. Boone

Abstract

Characteristics of an obligately methylotrophic coccoid methanogen (strain GS-16) previously isolated from estuarine sediment are described. Growth was demonstrated on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) or trimethylamine (TMA), but not on methane thiol, methane thiol plus hydrogen, dimethyl disulfide, or methionine. DMS-grown cells were able to metabolize DMS and TMA simultaneously when inoculated into media containing substrate levels of these compounds. However, TMA-grown cells could not metabolize [C]DMS to CH(4), although they could convert [C]methanol to CH(4). These results suggest that metabolism of DMS proceeds along a somewhat different route than that of TMA and perhaps also that of methanol. The organism exhibited doubling times of 23 and 32 h for growth (25 degrees C) in mineral media on TMA and DMS, respectively. Doubling times were more rapid ( approximately 6 h) when the organisms were grown on TMA in complex broth. In mineral media, the fastest growth on DMS occurred between pH levels of 7.0 and 8.7, at 29 degrees C, and with 0.2 to 0.4 M Na and 0.04 M Mg. Somewhat different results occurred for growth on TMA in complex broth. Cells had a moles percent G+C value of 44.5% for their DNA. Growth on DMS, TMA, and methanol yielded stable carbon isotope fractionation factors of 1.044, 1.037, and 1.063, respectively. Fractionation factors for hydrogen were 1.203 (DMS) and 1.183 (TMA).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 44%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,541,526
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#7,471
of 17,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,063
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.