The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A New Analysis of Mars “Special Regions”: Findings of the Second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group (SR-SAG2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Astrobiology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1089/ast.2014.1227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John D. Rummel, David W. Beaty, Melissa A. Jones, Corien Bakermans, Nadine G. Barlow, Penelope J. Boston, Vincent F. Chevrier, Benton C. Clark, Jean-Pierre P. de Vera, Raina V. Gough, John E. Hallsworth, James W. Head, Victoria J. Hipkin, Thomas L. Kieft, Alfred S. McEwen, Michael T. Mellon, Jill A. Mikucki, Wayne L. Nicholson, Christopher R. Omelon, Ronald Peterson, Eric E. Roden, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Kenneth L. Tanaka, Donna Viola, James J. Wray |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#338,669
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Astrobiology
#96
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,339
of 277,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrobiology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.