↓ Skip to main content

急性期病院における臓器提供の意思確認を実施するための終末期医療の質改善を目的とした教育プログラムの開発と評価

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Transplantation, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
急性期病院における臓器提供の意思確認を実施するための終末期医療の質改善を目的とした教育プログラムの開発と評価
Published in
Japanese Journal of Transplantation, November 2017
DOI 10.11386/jst.52.4-5_346
Authors

瀬戸 加奈子, 松本 邦愛, 高橋 絹代, 藤田 民夫, 高原 史郎, 相川 厚, 篠崎 尚史, 長谷川 友紀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#13
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,948
of 449,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.