↓ Skip to main content

報告1.石切参道「占いストリート」の今昔(「生駒の神々」再訪-後期近代の視点-,テーマセッション1,2011年度学術大会・テーマセッション記録)

Overview of attention for article published in Religion and Society, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
報告1.石切参道「占いストリート」の今昔(「生駒の神々」再訪-後期近代の視点-,テーマセッション1,2011年度学術大会・テーマセッション記録)
Published in
Religion and Society, July 2017
DOI 10.20594/religionandsociety.18.0_114
Authors

對馬 路人

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Religion and Society
#64
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,283
of 326,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Religion and Society
#42
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.