↓ Skip to main content

Development of the Japanese version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of the Japanese version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2005
DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.76.461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiko Otake, Satoshi Shimai, Akira Ikemi, Narisuke Utsuki, Christopher Peterson, Martin E P Seligman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 58%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,484,736
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#263
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,082
of 152,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them