↓ Skip to main content

Automation in Compilation and Drafting of Maps

Overview of attention for article published in Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automation in Compilation and Drafting of Maps
Published in
Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, July 2011
DOI 10.11212/jjca1963.3.4_23
Authors

Kiyoshi Ishii, Shigeru Fuse, Hisashi Hiraide

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,926,829
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#91
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,331
of 132,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#66
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.