↓ Skip to main content

Estimating effects of constraints on plant performance with regression quantiles

Overview of attention for article published in Oikos, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating effects of constraints on plant performance with regression quantiles
Published in
Oikos, April 2003
DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910205.x
Authors

Brian S. Cade, Qinfeng Guo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 94 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 45%
Environmental Science 29 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,411,853
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#1,633
of 3,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,986
of 60,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#41
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.