↓ Skip to main content

Transboundary Water Dispute over the Euphrates and Tigris River Basin

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transboundary Water Dispute over the Euphrates and Tigris River Basin
Published in
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, January 2010
DOI 10.3178/jjshwr.23.144
Authors

Yukio TANAKA, Mikiyasu NAKAYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#29
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,365
of 175,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.