The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutual information reveals multiple structural relaxation mechanisms in a model glass former
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms7089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Dunleavy, Karoline Wiesner, Ryoichi Yamamoto, C. Patrick Royall |
| Abstract |
Among the key challenges to our understanding of solidification in the glass transition is that it is accompanied by little apparent change in structure. Recently, geometric motifs have been identified in glassy liquids, but a causal link between these motifs and solidification remains elusive. One 'smoking gun' for such a link would be identical scaling of structural and dynamic lengthscales on approaching the glass transition, but this is highly controversial. Here we introduce an information theoretic approach to determine correlations in displacement for particle relaxation encoded in the initial configuration of a glass-forming liquid. We uncover two populations of particles, one inclined to relax quickly, the other slowly. Each population is correlated with local density and geometric motifs. Our analysis further reveals a dynamic lengthscale similar to that associated with structural properties, which may resolve the discrepancy between structural and dynamic lengthscales. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 31 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 95% |
| Scientists | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 36 | 39% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#183,514
of 26,501,765 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,619
of 61,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,928
of 363,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#16
of 683 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,501,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 683 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.