↓ Skip to main content

Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin in Japanese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
583 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin in Japanese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Published in
Circulation Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masatsugu Hori, Masayasu Matsumoto, Norio Tanahashi, Shin-ichi Momomura, Shinichiro Uchiyama, Shinya Goto, Tohru Izumi, Yukihiro Koretsune, Mariko Kajikawa, Masaharu Kato, Hitoshi Ueda, Kazuya Iwamoto, Masahiro Tajiri, on behalf of the J-ROCKET AF study investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 303 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 15%
Other 41 13%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 68 22%
Unknown 63 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 74 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,779,058
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#107
of 2,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,773
of 182,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.