The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水道コンセッション事業の入札方式と経済的効率性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2208/jscejipm.73.i_309 |
| Authors |
大西 正光, 村上 武士, Wu Peiwei, 小林 潔司 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#56
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,548
of 452,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.