↓ Skip to main content

Combining InSAR and GPS to Determine Transient Movement and Thickness of a Seasonally Active Low‐Gradient Translational Landslide

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining InSAR and GPS to Determine Transient Movement and Thickness of a Seasonally Active Low‐Gradient Translational Landslide
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017gl076623
Authors

Xie Hu, Zhong Lu, Thomas C. Pierson, Rebecca Kramer, David L. George

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 34%
Engineering 11 17%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,503,921
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#12,685
of 19,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,021
of 474,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#173
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.