The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The utility of point count surveys to predict wildlife interactions with wind energy facilities: An example focused on golden eagles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Indicators, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.024 |
Authors |
Maitreyi Sur, James R. Belthoff, Emily R. Bjerre, Brian A. Millsap, Todd Katzner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 26% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#1,296
of 3,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,241
of 339,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.