↓ Skip to main content

The utility of point count surveys to predict wildlife interactions with wind energy facilities: An example focused on golden eagles

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The utility of point count surveys to predict wildlife interactions with wind energy facilities: An example focused on golden eagles
Published in
Ecological Indicators, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.024
Authors

Maitreyi Sur, James R. Belthoff, Emily R. Bjerre, Brian A. Millsap, Todd Katzner

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 26%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 36%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#1,296
of 3,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,241
of 339,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.