The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diets of Hartebeest and Roan Antelope in Burkina Faso: Support of the Long-Faced Hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, May 1998
|
| DOI | 10.2307/1382973 |
| Authors |
James R. Schuette, David M. Leslie, Robert L. Lochmiller, Jonathan A. Jenks |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#1,205
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,648
of 33,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them