↓ Skip to main content

The elasticity of the MgSiO3 post-perovskite phase in the Earth's lowermost mantle

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The elasticity of the MgSiO3 post-perovskite phase in the Earth's lowermost mantle
Published in
Nature, July 2004
DOI 10.1038/nature02702
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Iitaka, K. Hirose, K. Kawamura, M. Murakami

Abstract

MgSiO3 perovskite has been assumed to be the dominant component of the Earth's lower mantle, although this phase alone cannot explain the discontinuity in seismic velocities observed 200-300 km above the core-mantle boundary (the D" discontinuity) or the polarization anisotropy observed in the lowermost mantle. Experimental and theoretical studies that have attempted to attribute these phenomena to a phase transition in the perovskite phase have tended to simply confirm the stability of the perovskite phase. However, recent in situ X-ray diffraction measurements have revealed a transition to a 'post-perovskite' phase above 125 GPa and 2,500 K--conditions close to those at the D" discontinuity. Here we show the results of first-principles calculations of the structure, stability and elasticity of both phases at zero temperature. We find that the post-perovskite phase becomes the stable phase above 98 GPa, and may be responsible for the observed seismic discontinuity and anisotropy in the lowermost mantle. Although our ground-state calculations of the unit cell do not include the effects of temperature and minor elements, they do provide a consistent explanation for a number of properties of the D" layer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Professor 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 74 52%
Materials Science 12 8%
Physics and Astronomy 12 8%
Chemistry 8 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,325
of 90,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,666
of 53,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#224
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.