↓ Skip to main content

21世紀出生児縦断調査の概要:児の発育に影響を及ぼす要因

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
21世紀出生児縦断調査の概要:児の発育に影響を及ぼす要因
Published in
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 2017
DOI 10.1265/jjh.72.15
Pubmed ID
Authors

佐田 文宏, 福岡 秀興, 尾崎 貴視, 伊藤 善也, 吉池 信男, 瀧本 秀美

Abstract

There are two major nationwide birth cohort studies in Japan, namely, the Longitudinal Survey of Newborns in the 21st Century conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) and the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS) conducted by the Ministry of Environment. The former was a longitudinal questionnaire survey focusing on environmental and socioeconomic factors for descriptive epidemiology conducted every year since 2001 by mail. The latter was based on 15 unit centers nationwide with environmental measurements and collection of biological samples for environmental risk evaluation. Both are prospective birth cohort studies whose findings will be expected as the basis for establishing health policies. The data obtained in the former study can be used for research with permission from MHLW. To date, there have been more than ten published studies using those data. We have reviewed these studies and introduced our preliminary findings on factors affecting infant growth. Employment before delivery, educational background of parents, household income, and smoking habit of both parents have been suggested to affect infant growth. We will analyze the associations between socioeconomic factors and infant growth trajectory to elucidate the most adequate intervention for children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Social Sciences 4 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#151
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,149
of 424,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.