↓ Skip to main content

北海道における食用ユリ葉枯れ症 (仮称) の発生とその病原について

Overview of attention for article published in ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
北海道における食用ユリ葉枯れ症 (仮称) の発生とその病原について
Published in
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN, August 2011
DOI 10.11455/kitanihon1966.1994.67
Authors

萩田 孝志, 佐々木 純

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN
#15
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,563
of 132,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.