↓ Skip to main content

食品風評被害につながる情報に対する認知的評価―情報取得形態の違いに着目して―

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食品風評被害につながる情報に対する認知的評価―情報取得形態の違いに着目して―
Published in
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2017
DOI 10.2130/jjesp.1603
Authors

尾関 美喜, 天野 正博

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#17,925,611
of 26,242,030 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#217
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,463
of 426,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,242,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.