The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On the Depth Extent of Coseismic RuptureOn the Depth Extent of Coseismic Rupture
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1785/0120160295 |
Authors |
N. M. Beeler, G. Hirth, T. E. Tullis, C. H. Webb |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 63% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,953,343
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#418
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,545
of 446,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.