↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Isonicotinoyl-γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and Nicotinoyl-GABA as Pro-drugs of GABA

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Isonicotinoyl-γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and Nicotinoyl-GABA as Pro-drugs of GABA
Published in
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1984
DOI 10.1248/cpb.32.4089
Pubmed ID
Authors

KENJI MATSUYAMA, CHIKAMASA YAMASHITA, ATSUKO NODA, SHIGERU GOTO, HIROSHI NODA, YASUYUKI ICHIMARU, YUTAKA GOMITA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Neuroscience 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,413,521
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#1,729
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,004
of 35,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#54
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.