↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic analysis of dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bacteriology, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic analysis of dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria
Published in
Journal of Bacteriology, April 1996
DOI 10.1128/jb.178.8.2402-2408.1996
Pubmed ID
Authors

D J Lonergan, H L Jenter, J D Coates, E J Phillips, T M Schmidt, D R Lovley

Abstract

Evolutionary relationships among strictly anaerobic dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria obtained from a diversity of sedimentary environments were examined by phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. Members of the genera Geobacter, Desulfuromonas, Pelobacter, and Desulfuromusa formed a monophyletic group within the delta subdivision of the class Proteobacteria. On the basis of their common ancestry and the shared ability to reduce Fe(III) and/or S0, we propose that this group be considered a single family, Geobacteraceae. Bootstrap analysis, characteristic nucleotides, and higher-order secondary structures support the division of Geobacteraceae into two subgroups, designated the Geobacter and Desulfuromonas clusters. The genus Desulfuromusa and Pelobacter acidigallici make up a distinct branch within the Desulfuromonas cluster. Several members of the family Geobacteraceae, none of which reduce sulfate, were found to contain the target sequences of probes that have been previously used to define the distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacterium-like microorganisms. The recent isolations of Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms distributed throughout the domain Bacteria suggest that development of 16S rRNA probes that would specifically target all Fe(III) reducers may not be feasible. However, all of the evidence suggests that if a 16S rRNA sequence falls within the family Geobacteraceae, then the organism has the capacity for Fe(III) reduction. The suggestion, based on geological evidence, that Fe(III) reduction was the first globally significant process for oxidizing organic matter back to carbon dioxide is consistent with the finding that acetate-oxidizing Fe(III) reducers are phylogenetically diverse.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 211 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 28%
Researcher 49 21%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor 15 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 37%
Environmental Science 52 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 40 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bacteriology
#5,801
of 16,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,456
of 27,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bacteriology
#49
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.