↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing quantitative approaches for assessing community resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing quantitative approaches for assessing community resilience
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.083
Pubmed ID
Authors

W.C. Chuang, A. Garmestani, T.N. Eason, T.L. Spanbauer, H.B. Fried-Petersen, C.P. Roberts, S.M. Sundstrom, J.L. Burnett, D.G. Angeler, B.C. Chaffin, L. Gunderson, D. Twidwell, C.R. Allen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 275 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 21%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Master 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Lecturer 15 5%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 70 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 50 18%
Social Sciences 42 15%
Engineering 24 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 86 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,272,773
of 26,496,895 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Management
#2,107
of 6,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,216
of 343,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Management
#48
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,496,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.