The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Demography, Environmental Uncertainty, and the Evolution of Mate Desertion in the Snail Kite
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology, December 1986
|
DOI | 10.2307/1939076 |
Authors |
Steven Beissinger |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 40% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 62% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,701,475
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,350
of 6,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,835
of 43,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.