The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Crustal Architecture of the Cascadia Forearc
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.266.5183.237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Trehu, I. Asudeh, T. M. Brocher, J. H. Luetgert, W. D. Mooney, J. L. Nabelek, Y. Nakamura |
| Abstract |
Seismic profiling data indicate that the thickness of an accreted oceanic terrane of Paleocene and early Eocene age, which forms the basement of much of the forearc beneath western Oregon and Washington, varies by approximately a factor of 4 along the strike of the Cascadia subduction zone. Beneath the Oregon Coast Range, the accreted terrane is 25 to 35 kilometers thick, whereas offshore Vancouver Island it is about 6 kilometers thick. These variations are correlated with variations in arc magmatism, forearc seismicity, and long-term forearc deformation. It is suggested that the strength of the forearc crust increases as the thickness of the accreted terrane increases and that the geometry of the seaward edge of this terrane influences deformation within the subduction complex and controls the amount of sediment that is deeply subducted. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 62 | 75% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,594,984
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Science
#48,313
of 78,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,602
of 22,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#125
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.