↓ Skip to main content

A Topographic Mould of Suo and Nagato Provinces made in Middle of Edo Ara

Overview of attention for article published in Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 126)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Topographic Mould of Suo and Nagato Provinces made in Middle of Edo Ara
Published in
Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, July 2011
DOI 10.11212/jjca1963.20.2_20
Authors

Hajime Miura, Hirotada Kawamura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,723,878
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#29
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,575
of 131,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.