↓ Skip to main content

2 Investigations of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rodents captured in Naha Airporto in the past 25 years(Contributed Papers,Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of Southern Region)

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Entomology and Zoology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2 Investigations of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rodents captured in Naha Airporto in the past 25 years(Contributed Papers,Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of Southern Region)
Published in
Medical Entomology and Zoology, January 2006
DOI 10.7601/mez.57.172_2
Authors

Y Kusui, H Nishiyama, H Igei, B Sakumoto, S Abe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical Entomology and Zoology
#194
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,083
of 174,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Entomology and Zoology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.