↓ Skip to main content

ウィリアム・キャスロンとその書体、そしてその今日性について(<特集>タイポグラフィ研究の現在)

Overview of attention for article published in Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ウィリアム・キャスロンとその書体、そしてその今日性について(<特集>タイポグラフィ研究の現在)
Published in
Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, November 2017
DOI 10.11247/jssds.17.2_50
Authors

田中 正明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,904,574
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#20
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,662
of 451,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.