↓ Skip to main content

鉄心内部の応力分布の影響を考慮した永久磁石モータのコギングトルク解析

Overview of attention for article published in IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 156)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鉄心内部の応力分布の影響を考慮した永久磁石モータのコギングトルク解析
Published in
IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, January 2006
DOI 10.1541/ieejias.126.74
Authors

Akihiro Daikoku, Masatsugu Nakano, Yoshihiro Tani, Shinichi Yamaguchi, Yukari Toide, Hideaki Arita, Takashi Yoshioka, Chiyo Fujino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications
#19
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,331
of 174,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.