The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
近赤外マルチバンドによる肌検出手法の提案
|
---|---|
Published in |
IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1541/ieejeiss.127.583 |
Authors |
鈴木 康弘, 山本 和彦, 加藤 邦人, 安藤 道則, 小島 真一 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,583,444
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems
#4
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,679
of 79,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them