↓ Skip to main content

Forest area and distribution in the Mississippi alluvial valley: implications for breeding bird conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biogeography, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest area and distribution in the Mississippi alluvial valley: implications for breeding bird conservation
Published in
Journal of Biogeography, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00348.x
Authors

Daniel J. Twedt, Charles R. Loesch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 28%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Other 4 6%
Professor 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 49%
Environmental Science 15 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,217,162
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biogeography
#1,844
of 3,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,574
of 128,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biogeography
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.