The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stress transfer by the 1988–1989 M = 5.3 and 5.4 Lake Elsman foreshocks to the Loma Prieta fault: Unclamping at the site of peak mainshock slip
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 1999
|
DOI | 10.1029/1999jb900092 |
Authors |
Hugo Perfettini, Ross S. Stein, Robert Simpson, Massimo Cocco |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 41% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 59% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,534
of 35,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#32
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.