The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Martian drainage densities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, April 1997
|
DOI | 10.1029/97je00113 |
Authors |
Michael H. Carr, Frank C. Chuang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 52% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,708
of 29,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#31
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.