The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hydrologic framework of the Santa Clara Valley, California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geosphere, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1130/ges01104.1 |
Authors |
R.T. Hanson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 3 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,050,769
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Geosphere
#83
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,188
of 267,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geosphere
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.