The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
児童養護施設における読書環境・活動の現状と課題 : 西日本地区の児童養護施設を対象とした調査を通して(【一般A-17】図書館・教育情報学(2),一般研究発表【A】,発表要旨)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11555/taikaip.70.0_330 |
| Authors |
野口 武悟, 前田 稔 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#37
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,490
of 341,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.