↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
19 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
973 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
597 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2005
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0502272102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jared C. Roach, Gustavo Glusman, Lee Rowen, Amardeep Kaur, Maureen K. Purcell, Kelly D. Smith, Leroy E. Hood, Alan Aderem

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 7 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 562 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 139 23%
Researcher 99 17%
Student > Master 69 12%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 6%
Other 110 18%
Unknown 84 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 289 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 1%
Other 41 7%
Unknown 96 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,225,908
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46,893
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,407
of 60,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#205
of 539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.