The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MtgA Deletion-Triggered Cell Enlargement of Escherichia coli for Enhanced Intracellular Polyester Accumulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0125163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryosuke Kadoya, Ken’ichiro Matsumoto, Toshihiko Ooi, Seiichi Taguchi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 36% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
Chemistry | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,769,795
of 26,504,585 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,536
of 230,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,227
of 281,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,793
of 6,795 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,504,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,795 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.