The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Studies on Lignan Lactone Antitumor Agents. II. : Synthesis of N-Alkylamino- and 2, 6-Dideoxy-2-aminoglycosidic Lignan Variants Related to Podophyllotoxin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1986
|
DOI | 10.1248/cpb.34.3741 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
HITOSHI SAITO, HIROSHI YOSHIKAWA, YOSHIO NISHIMURA, SHINICHI KONDO, TOMIO TAKEUCHI, HAMAO UMEZAWA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 1991.
All research outputs
#4,764,253
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#533
of 5,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,884
of 42,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#18
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.