The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct C-8 Lithiation of Naturally-Occurring Purine Nucleosides. A Simple Method for the Synthesis of 8-Carbon-Substituted Purine Nucleosides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1248/cpb.35.72 |
| Authors |
HIROYUKI HAYAKAWA, KAZUHIRO HARAGUCHI, HIROMICHI TANAKA, TADASHI MIYASAKA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2007.
All research outputs
#4,764,253
of 23,050,116 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#533
of 5,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,089
of 45,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#33
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,050,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.