The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Kennel Cough Complex : Confirmation and Analysis of the Outbreak in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 1988
|
DOI | 10.1292/jvms1939.50.851 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masayuki AZETAKA, Shin-ichiro KONISHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 60% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#161
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,602
of 49,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.