↓ Skip to main content

歴史家ゲオルギオス・スフランヅィスに関するプロソポグラフィー

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 214)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
歴史家ゲオルギオス・スフランヅィスに関するプロソポグラフィー
Published in
Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, April 2015
DOI 10.5356/jorient.54.74
Authors

平野 智洋

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,318,918
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#20
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,002
of 280,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them