The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global code motion/global value numbering
|
---|---|
Published in |
ACM SIGPLAN Notices, June 1995
|
DOI | 10.1145/223428.207154 |
Authors |
Cliff Click |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 31 | 79% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,316,232
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from ACM SIGPLAN Notices
#141
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,163
of 23,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM SIGPLAN Notices
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.