↓ Skip to main content

Rapid serological analysis of bacterial lipopolysaccharides by electrotransfer to nitrocellulose

Overview of attention for article published in Immunotechnology, December 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid serological analysis of bacterial lipopolysaccharides by electrotransfer to nitrocellulose
Published in
Immunotechnology, December 1985
DOI 10.1016/0022-1759(85)90146-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen W. Pyle, William B. Schill

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 2 25%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Environmental Science 2 25%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 1992.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Immunotechnology
#1,929
of 4,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,026
of 42,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunotechnology
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.