↓ Skip to main content

Somatic Mutations and Clonal Hematopoiesis in Aplastic Anemia

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Somatic Mutations and Clonal Hematopoiesis in Aplastic Anemia
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1414799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuichi Yoshizato, Bogdan Dumitriu, Kohei Hosokawa, Hideki Makishima, Kenichi Yoshida, Danielle Townsley, Aiko Sato-Otsubo, Yusuke Sato, Delong Liu, Hiromichi Suzuki, Colin O Wu, Yuichi Shiraishi, Michael J Clemente, Keisuke Kataoka, Yusuke Shiozawa, Yusuke Okuno, Kenichi Chiba, Hiroko Tanaka, Yasunobu Nagata, Takamasa Katagiri, Ayana Kon, Masashi Sanada, Phillip Scheinberg, Satoru Miyano, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Shinji Nakao, Neal S Young, Seishi Ogawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 434 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 86 19%
Other 65 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 104 23%
Unknown 76 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 199 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Unspecified 4 <1%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 93 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,896,977
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#13,257
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,129
of 281,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#156
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.