↓ Skip to main content

ざ瘡患者を対象としたダラシン ® T ローション 1 %を用いた直接塗布法とコットンパフ使用法との臨床的有用性ならびに患者使用感に関する比較検討

Overview of attention for article published in The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ざ瘡患者を対象としたダラシン ® T ローション 1 %を用いた直接塗布法とコットンパフ使用法との臨床的有用性ならびに患者使用感に関する比較検討
Published in
The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology, February 2013
DOI 10.2336/nishinihonhifu.74.630
Authors

窪田 泰夫, 宗広 明日香, 小浦 綾子, 白髭 由恵, 横井 郁美, 前田 麗子, 石川 絵美子, 細川 洋一郎, 森上 純子, 森上 徹也, 中井 浩三, 米田 耕造

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology
#91
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,279
of 206,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them