↓ Skip to main content

睾丸ノ容積,重量竝ニ位置ト精系特ニ其ノ擧睾筋トノ相互關係ニ就テ

Overview of attention for article published in Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association), January 1936
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
睾丸ノ容積,重量竝ニ位置ト精系特ニ其ノ擧睾筋トノ相互關係ニ就テ
Published in
Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association), January 1936
DOI 10.4044/joma1889.48.11_2716
Authors

森岡 雄太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,073,252
of 24,942,536 outputs
Outputs from Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association)
#11
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,942,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them